Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 230-245 , June 2010

Magnetic Resonance Techniques for the Brainstem

  • J. Alvarez-Linera, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: J. Alvarez-Linera, MD, Jefe de Sección de Neurorradiología, Servicio de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Hospital Ruber Internacional, La Masó 38, Madrid 28034, Spain

References 

  1. McGowan JC, Patel RS. Technical issues for MRI examination of the posterior fossa. J Neurol Sci. 2000;172(suppl 1):S40–S42
  2. Bradley WC. MR of the brain stem: A practical approach. Radiology. 1991;179:319–3321
  3. Gass A, Filippi M, Grossman RI. The contribution of MRI in the differential diagnosis of posterior fossa damage. J Neurol Sci. 2000;172(suppl 1):S43–S49
  4. Yousry TA, Grossman RI, Filippi M. Assessment of posterior fossa damage in MS using MRI. J Neurol Sci. 2000;172(suppl 1):S50–S53
  5. Bastianello S, Bozzao A, Paolillo A, et al. Fast spin-echo and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus conventional spin-echo sequences for MR quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions. Neuroradiology. 1997;18:699–7041997
  6. Melhem ER, Bert RJ, Walker RE, et al. Usefulness of optimized gadolinium-enhanced fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging in revealing lesions of the brain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:803–8071998
  7. Ladd ME. High-field-strength magnetic resonance: Potential and limits. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;18:139–152
  8. Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007;15:277–290
  9. Huang BY, Castillo M. Neurovascular imaging at 1.5 Tesla versus 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009;17:29–46
  10. Willinek WA, Kuhl CK. 3.0 T neuroimaging: Technical considerations and clinical applications. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 16:217-228:ix; 2006;
  11. Fries P, Runge VM, Kirchin MA, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: Current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER). Invest Radiol. 2009;44:351–359
  12. Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:232–252
  13. Manova ES, Habib CA, Boikov AS, et al. Characterizing the mesencephalon using susceptibility-weighted imaging. Neuroradiology. 2009;30:569–574
  14. Fischbach F, Müller M, Bruhn H. High-resolution depiction of the cranial nerves in the posterior fossa (N III-N XII) with 2D fast spin echo and 3D gradient echo sequences at 3.0 T. Clin Imaging33. 2008;169–174
  15. Sartoretti-Schefer S, Kollias S, Valavanis A. Spatial relationship between vestibular schwannoma and facial nerve on three-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:810–816
  16. Mitsuoka H, Tsunoda A, Okuda O, et al. Delineation of small nerves and blood vessels with three-dimensional fast spin-echo MR imaging: Comparison of presurgical and surgical findings in patients with hemifacial spasm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1823–1829
  17. Henson JS, Ulmer S, Harris GJ. Brain tumor imaging in clinical trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;29:419–424
  18. Naganawa S, Koshikawa T, Nakamura T, et al. Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1901–1908
  19. Bink A, Schmitt M, Gaa J, et al. Detection of lesions in multiple sclerosis by 2D FLAIR and single-slab 3D FLAIR sequences at 3.0 T: Initial results. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1104–1110
  20. Naganawa S, Sugiura M, Kawamura M, et al. Prompt contrast enhancement of cerebrospinal fluid space in the fundus of the internal auditory canal: observations in patients with meningeal diseases on 3D-FLAIR images at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2006;5:151
  21. Galassi W, Phuttharak W, Hesselink JR, et al. Intracranial meningeal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:553–559
  22. Sudhyadhom A, Haq IU, Foote KD, et al. A high resolution and high contrast MRI for differentiation of subcortical structures for DBS targeting: the fast Gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery (FGATIR). Neuroimage. 2009;47(suppl 2):T44–T52
  23. Vertinsky AT, Coenen VA, Lang DJ, et al. Localization of the subthalamic nucleus: optimization with susceptibility-weighted phase MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1717–1724
  24. Yoshino N, Akimoto H, Yamada I, et al. Trigeminal neuralgia: evaluation of neuralgic manifestation and site of neurovascular compression with 3D CISS MR imaging and MR angiography. Radiology. 2003;228:539–545
  25. DeLano MC, DeMarco JK. 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR angiography of the head and neck. Neuroimaging Clin North Am. 2006;16:321–341xi
  26. Alvarez-Linera J. 3T MRI: Advances in brain imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2008;67:415–426
  27. Gibbs GF, Huston J, Bernstein MA, et al. 3.0-Tesla MR angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:97–102
  28. Eddleman CS, Jeong HJ, Hurley MC, et al. 4D radial acquisition contrast-enhanced MR angiography and intracranial arteriovenous malformations: Quickly approaching digital subtraction angiography. Stroke. 2009;40:2749–2753
  29. Nishimura S, Hirai T, Sasao A. Evaluation of dural arteriovenous fistulas with 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:80–85
  30. Farb RI, Agid R, Willinsky RA, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula: Diagnosis and classification with time-resolved MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1546–1551
  31. Karaarslan E, Arslan A. Diffusion weighted MR imaging in non-infarct lesions of the brain. Eur J Radiol. 2008;65:402–416
  32. Liu P, Saida Y, Yoshioka H, et al. MR imaging of epidermoids at the cerebellopontine angle. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2003;2:109–115
  33. Tsuruda JS, Chew WM, Moseley ME, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain: Value of differentiating between extraaxial cysts and epidermoid tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:1059–1065
  34. Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-León J, Escribano J, et al. Predicting the histopathological grade of cerebral gliomas using high b value MR DW imaging at 3-Tesla. Neuroimaging. 2008;18:276–281
  35. Nagae-Poetscher LM, Jiang H, Wakana S. High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of the brain stem at 3 T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1325–1330
  36. Habas C, Cabanis EA. Anatomical parcellation of the brainstem and cerebellar white matter: a preliminary probabilistic tractography study at 3 T. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:849–863
  37. Ludeman NA, Berman JI, Wu YW, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the pyramidal tracts in infants with motor dysfunction. Neurology. 2008;71:1676–1682
  38. Thomalla G, Glauche V, Koch MA, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging detects early Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract after ischemic stroke. Neuroimage. 2004;22:1767–1774
  39. Rizzo G, Martinelli P, Manners D, et al. Diffusion-weighted brain imaging study of patients with clinical diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2008;131:2690–2700
  40. Herweh C, Kress B, Rasche D, et al. Loss of anisotropy in trigeminal neuralgia revealed by diffusion tensor imaging. Neurology. 2007;68:776–778
  41. Wintermark M, Sesay M, Barbier E, et al. Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques. J Neuroradiol. 2005;32:294–314
  42. Lacerda S, Law M. Magnetic resonance perfusion and permeability imaging in brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin North Am. 2009;19:527–557
  43. Majós C, Aguilera C, Alonso J, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy improves discrimination between tumor and pseudotumoral lesion in solid brain masses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:544–545
  44. Senft C, Hattingen E, Pilatus U, et al. Diagnostic value of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the noninvasive grading of solid gliomas: Comparison of maximum and mean choline values. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:908–913
  45. Law M, Yang S, Wang H, et al. Glioma grading: Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. Neuroradiology. 2003;24:1989–1998
  46. Smith EA, Carlos RC, Junck LR, et al. Developing a clinical decision model: MR spectroscopy to differentiate between recurrent tumor and radiation change in patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:W45–W52
  47. Mascalchi M, Brugnoli R, Guerrini L, et al. Single-voxel long TE 1H-MR spectroscopy of the normal brainstem and cerebellum. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:532–537
  48. Tran TK, Vigneron DB, Sailasuta N, et al. Very selective suppression pulses for clinical MRSI studies of brain and prostate cancer. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43:23–33
  49. Porto L, Hattingen E, Pilatus U, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in childhood brainstem lesions. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23:305–314
  50. Broniscer A, Gajjar A, Bhargava R, et al. Braistem involvement in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: Role of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the distinction from diffuse pontine glioma. Neurosurgery. 1997;40:331–337
  51. Edelstein WA, Glover GH, Hardy CJ, et al. The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1986;3:604–618
  52. Gruetter R, Weisdorf SA, Rajanayagan V, et al. Resolution improvements in in vivo 1H NMR spectra with increased magnetic field strength. J Magn Reson. 1998;135:260–264
  53. Yerli H, Ağildere AM, Ozen O, et al. Evaluation of cerebral glioma grade by using normal side creatine as an internal reference in multi-voxel 1H-MR spectroscopy. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2007;13:3–9
  54. Schumacher M, Schulte-Mönting J, Stoeter P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging compared with biopsy in the diagnosis of brainstem diseases of childhood: A multicenter review. Neurosurgery. 2007;106:111–119(suppl)
  55. Lee BC, Kneeland JB, Walker RW, et al. MR imaging of brainstem tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1985;6:159–163
  56. Laprie A, Pirzkall A, Haas-Kogan DA, et al. Longitudinal multivoxel MR spectroscopy study of pediatric diffuse brainstem gliomas treated with radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:20–31
  57. Weybright P, Maly P, Gomez-Hassan D, et al. MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of recurrent contrast-enhancing lesions in the posterior fossa after tumor treatment. Neuroradiology. 2004;46:541–549

PII: S0887-2171(10)00022-3

doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2010.03.003

Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 230-245 , June 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution