Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 14-28 , February 2010

Radiation Risks from Exposure to Chest Computed Tomography

References 

  1. Richmond C. Sir Gregory Hounsfield. BMJ. 2004;329:687
  2. Amis ES, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. ACR white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:272–284
  3. Balter S. AAPM tutorial: Scientific views of low-level radiation risks. Radiographics. 1991;11:509–518
  4. Tubiana M, Reinendegen LE, Yang C, et al. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biological experimental data. Radiology. 2009;251:13–22
  5. Little MP. Risks associated with ionizing radiation. Br Med Bull. 2003;68:259–275
  6. ACR Appropriateness Criteria (Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction). http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/app_criteria/RRLInformation.aspxAccessed January 23, 2009
  7. Rothenberg LN, Pentlow KS. AAPM tutorial: Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics. 1992;12:1225–1243
  8. Parry RA, Glaze SA, Archer BR. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology. Radiographics. 1999;19:1289–1302
  9. McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: Topics in CT. Radiographics. 2002;22:1541–1553
  10. Lee CH, Goo JM, Lee HJ, et al. Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: From basics to practice. Radiographics. 2008;28:1451–1459
  11. Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–263
  12. Valentin J. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP Publication 103). Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332
  13. McCollough CH. CT dose: How to measure, how to reduce. Health Phys. 2008;95:508–517
  14. Huda W. Dose and image quality in CT. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32:709–713
  15. Verdun FR, Bochud F, Gundinchet F, et al. Quality initiatives radiation risk: What you should know to tell your patient. Radiographics. 2008;28:1807–1816
  16. Mayo JR, Aldrich J, Muller NL. Radiation exposure at chest CT: A statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2003;228:15–21
  17. Martin CJ. Effective dose: How should it be applied to medical exposure?. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:639–647
  18. Brenner DJ. Effective dose: A flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:521–523
  19. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res. 2007;168:1–64
  20. Preston DL, Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, et al. Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates. Radiat Res. 2004;162:377–389
  21. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:13761–13766
  22. Preston RJ. Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures. Health Phys. 2008;95:541–546
  23. Ron E. Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys. 2003;85:47–59
  24. Little MP, Wakeford R, Tawn EJ, et al. Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: Why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology. 2009;251:6–12
  25. Mezrich R. Are CT scans carcinogenic?. [editorial] J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5:691–693
  26. Mayo JR. Radiation dose issues in longitudinal studies involving computed tomography. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5:934–939
  27. Mettler FA, Thomadsen BR, Bhargavan M, et al. Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: Preliminary results. Health Phys. 2008;95:502–507
  28. Schauer DA. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, medical exposure—are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists?. Health Phys. 2009;97:1–5
  29. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2009;(NCRP Report No. 160)
  30. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States: Recommendations of the National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 1987;(NCRP Report No. 93)
  31. Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Hart D. Diagnostic medical exposure in the U.K.. Appl Radiat Isot. 1999;50:261–269
  32. Imaging and radiodiagnostic examinations and tests, NHS organizations in England, 1995-1996. http://www.performance.doh.gov.uk/hospitalactivity/data_requests/imaging_and_radiodiagnostics.htmAccessed May 20, 2009
  33. Imaging and radiodiagnostic examinations and tests, NHS organizations in England, 2007-2008. http://www.performance.doh.gov.uk/hospitalactivity/data_requests/imaging_and_radiodiagnostics.htmAccessed May 20, 2009
  34. Mettler FA, Wiest PW, Locken JA, et al. CT scanning: Patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot. 2000;20:353–359
  35. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, et al. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–296
  36. The alliance for radiation safety in pediatric imaging (Image gently). http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/index.cfm?page=364Accessed May 9, 2009
  37. Arslanoğlu A, Bilgin S, Kubal Z, et al. Doctors' and intern doctors' knowledge about patients' ionizing radiation exposure doses during common radiological examinations. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2007;13:53–55
  38. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, et al. CT scans: Assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004;231:393–398
  39. Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, et al. Doctors' knowledge of radiation exposure: Questionnaire study. BMJ. 2003;327:371–372
  40. Soye JA, Paterson A. A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionally in Northern Ireland. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:725–729
  41. Haramati LB. Ethical trials to determine the risks and benefits of radiation exposure from coronary CT angiography. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5:1073–1076
  42. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284
  43. Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009;251:175–184
  44. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology. 2004;232:735–738
  45. de Gonzales AB, Kim KP, Samet JM. Radiation-induced cancer risk from annual computed tomography for patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:970–973
  46. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2009. http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdfAccessed May 20, 2009
  47. Preston DL, Mattsson A, Holmberg E, et al. Radiation effects on breast cancer risk: A pooled analysis of eight cohorts. Radiat Res. 2002;158:220–235
  48. Ronckers CM, Erdmann CA, Land CE. Radiation and breast cancer: A review of current evidence. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:21–32
  49. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. The National Academies Press. 2006;http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=R1Accessed February 2, 2009
  50. Pierce DA, Sharp GB, Mabuchi K. Joint effects of radiation and smoking on lung cancer risk among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res. 2003;159:511–520
  51. Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:362–378
  52. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby A. Risk of cancer from diagnostic x-rays: Estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004;363:345–351
  53. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF. Screening of lung cancer: Update 2007. Oncologist. 2008;13:65–78
  54. Black C, de Verteuil R, Walker S, et al. Population screening for lung cancer using computed tomography, is there evidence of clinical effectiveness? (A systematic review of the literature). Thorax. 2007;62:131–138
  55. Jett JR, Midthun DE. Commentary: CT screening for lung cancer—caveat emptor. Oncologist. 2008;13:439–444
  56. Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M, et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology. 2002;222:773–781
  57. Patz E, Swenson SJ, Herndon JE. Estimate of lung cancer mortality from low-dose spiral computed tomography screening trials: Implications for current mass screening recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2202–2206
  58. Ravenel JG, Costello P, Silvestri GA. Screening for lung cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:755–761
  59. Bach PB, Silvestri GA, Hanger M, et al. Screening for lung cancer (ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (ed 2)). Chest. 2007;132(suppl 3):69S–77S
  60. Aberle DR, Brown K. Lung cancer screening with CT. Clin Chest Med. 2008;29:1–14
  61. Henschke CI, Shaham D, Yankelevitz DF, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: Past and ongoing studies. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;17:99–106
  62. Bach PB, Jett JR, Pastorino U, et al. Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA. 2007;297:953–961
  63. Yau G, Lock M, Rodrigues G. Systematic review of baseline low-dose CT lung cancer screening. Lung Cancer. 2007;58:161–170
  64. Black WC. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer (Review of screening principles and update on current status). Cancer. 2007;110:2370–2384
  65. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM, et al. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1763–1771
  66. Reich JM. A critical appraisal of overdiagnosis: Estimates of its magnitude and implications for lung cancer screening. Thorax. 2008;63:377–383
  67. Fujikawa A, Takiguchi Y, Mizuno S, et al. Lung cancer screening—comparison of computed tomography and x-ray. Lung Cancer. 2008;61:195–201
  68. Clark R. Principles of cancer screening. Semin Roentgenol. 2003;38:7–18
  69. Swenson SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: Five-year prospective experience. Radiology. 2005;235:259–265
  70. Mascalchi M, Belli G, Zappa M, et al. Risk-benefit analysis of x-ray exposure associated with lung cancer screening in the Italung-CT trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:421–429
  71. Brenner DJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology. 2004;231:440–445
  72. Brant-Zawadski MN. 2001 Plenary session: Friday imaging symposium (Screening CT: Rationale). Radiographics. 2002;22:1532–1539
  73. Brant-Zawadski MN. The role of computed tomography in screening for cancer. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(suppl 4):D52–D54
  74. Berland LL, Berland NW. Whole-body computed tomography screening. Semin Roentgenol. 2003;38:65–76
  75. Berlin L. Medicolegal and ethical issues in radiologic screening. Semin Roentgenol. 2003;38:77–86
  76. Burger IM, Kass NE, Sunshine JH, et al. The use of CT screening: A national survey of radiologists' activities and attitudes. Radiology. 2008;248:160–168
  77. McNitt-Gray MF. Radiation issues in computed tomography screening. Semin Roentgenol. 2003;38:87–99
  78. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, et al. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2004;232:18–37
  79. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics (Fast stats A to Z). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/heart.htmAccessed March 3, 2009
  80. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: Reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1081–1086
  81. Lee HY, Yoo SM, White CS. Coronary CT angiography in emergency department patients with acute chest pain: Triple rule-out protocol versus dedicated coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:319–326
  82. Bielak LF, Peyser PA, Sheedy PF. Electron-beam computed tomography screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease. Semin Roentgenol. 2003;38:39–53
  83. Schoenhagen P, Halliburton SS, Stillman AE, et al. Noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries: Current and future role of multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2004;232:7–17
  84. Oudkerk M, Stillman AE, Halliburton SS, et al. Coronary artery calcium screening: Current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2785–2807
  85. Gaspar T, Halon D, Rubinshtein R, et al. Clinical applications and future trends in cardiac CTA. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(suppl 4):D10–D14
  86. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475–1497
  87. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724–1732
  88. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MHK. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease. JAMA. 2006;296:403–411
  89. Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell JW, et al. Coronary arteries: Diagnostic performance of 16-versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography—meta-analysis. Radiology. 2007;245:720–731
  90. Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: Effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology. 2003;226:145–152
  91. Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, et al. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007;116:1290–1305
  92. Budoff MJ. Maximizing dose reductions with cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25(suppl 2):279–287
  93. Paul JF, Abada HT. Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2028–2037
  94. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA. 2009;301:500–507
  95. Horiguchi J, Kiguchi M, Fujioka C, et al. Radiation dose, image quality, stenosis measurement, and CT densitometry using ECG-triggered coronary 64-MDCT angiography: A phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:315–320
  96. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317–323
  97. Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: Implications for cancer induction. Radiology. 2007;245:742–750
  98. Schoepf UJ, Huda W, Abro J, et al. Realistic risks of radiation-induced cancer in a clinical patient population undergoing cardiac CT. http://rsna2008.rsna.org/event_display.cfm?em_id=6007121Accessed June 17, 2009
  99. Cody DD, Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents (Technologic advances in multi-detector CT with a focus on cardiac imaging). Radiographics. 2007;27:1829–1837
  100. Mayo JR, Leipsic JA. Radiation dose in cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:646–653
  101. Alkadhi H. Radiation dose of cardiac CT—what is the evidence?. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1311–1315
  102. Abada HT, Larchez C, Daoud B, et al. MDCT of the coronary arteries: Feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(suppl 2):S387–S390
  103. Takakuwa KM, Halpern EJ, Gingold EL, et al. Radiation dose in a “triple rule-out” coronary CT angiography protocol in emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: The impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:866–872
  104. Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: Comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;248:431–437
  105. Gopal A, Mao SS, Karlsberg D, et al. Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:405–416
  106. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: Assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;248:424–430
  107. Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, et al. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA. 2009;301:2340–2348
  108. Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalendar WA. Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: Image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1188–1198
  109. McCullough CH, Primak AN, Saba O, et al. Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology. 2007;243:775–784
  110. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T, et al. Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:592–599
  111. Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, et al. Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: The effect of tailoring the protocol to patient specific parameters. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:385–391
  112. Ryu JH, Swensen SJ, Olson EJ, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with use of computed tomography angiography. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:59–65
  113. Goodman LR. 1999 Plenary Session: Friday imaging symposium: CT diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Radiographics. 2000;20:1201–1205
  114. Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, et al. Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: Comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1041–1047
  115. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax. 2003;58:470–484
  116. Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR, et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: A statement from the Fleishner society. Radiology. 2007;245:315–329
  117. Donohoo JH, Mayo-Smith WW, Pezzullo JA, et al. Utilization patterns and diagnostic yield of 3421 consecutive multidetector row computed tomography pulmonary angiograms in a busy emergency department. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32:421–425
  118. Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, et al. CT pulmonary angiography: A comparative analysis of the utilization patterns in emergency department and hospitalized patients between 1998 and 2003. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1093–1096
  119. O'Neill J, Murchison JT, Wright L, et al. Effect of the introduction of helical CT on radiation dose in the investigation of pulmonary embolism. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:46–50
  120. Kuiper JW, Geleijns J, Matheijssen NAA, et al. Radiation exposure of multi-row detector spiral computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries: Comparison with digital subtraction pulmonary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1496–1500
  121. Coche E, Vynckier S, Octave-Prignot M. Pulmonary embolism: Radiation dose with multi-detector row CT and digital angiography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;240:690–697
  122. Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: Prospective randomized study. Radiology. 2007;245:577–583
  123. Szucs-Furkas Z, Kurmann L, Strautz T, et al. Patient exposure and image quality of low-dose pulmonary computed angiography: Comparison of 100- and 80-kVp protocols. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:871–876
  124. Joseph-Schoepf U, Savino G, Lake DR, et al. The age of CT pulmonary angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2005;20:273–279
  125. Schaefer-Prokop C, Prokop M. MDCT for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(suppl 4):D37–D41
  126. Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Weber M, et al. CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: Improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage setting. Radiology. 2006;241:899–907
  127. Carmichael A, Sami AS, Dixon JM. Breast cancer risk among the survivors of atomic bomb and patients exposed to therapeutic ionizing radiation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:475–479
  128. Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, et al. Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic x rays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1307–1312
  129. Land CE, Tokunaga M, Koyama K, et al. Incidence of female breast cancer among atomic bomb survivors, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1950-1990. Radiat Res. 2003;160:707–717
  130. Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, et al. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1228–1233
  131. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Reiman RE, et al. Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1718–1722
  132. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, et al. Radiation dose savings for adult pulmonary embolus 64-MDCT using bismuth breast shields, lower peak kilovoltage, and automatic tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:244–253
  133. Hopper KD, King SH, Lobell ME, et al. The breast: In-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT—shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. Radiology. 1997;205:853–858
  134. Yilmax MH, Albayram S, Yasar D, et al. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:138–142
  135. Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Frush DP, et al. In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: Effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:407–411
  136. Pahade JK, Litmanovich D, Pedrosa I, et al. Imaging pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: What the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. 2009;29:639–654
  137. Schaefer-Prokop C, Prokop M. CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism during pregnancy. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2705–2708
  138. Coche E, Verschuren F, Keyeux A, et al. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: Comparison of thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 2003;229:757–765
  139. Schoepf UJ, Costello P. CT angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: State of the art. Radiology. 2004;230:329–337
  140. Thrall JH. Radiation exposure: Politics and opinion vs science and pragmatism. [editorial] J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6:133–134
  141. Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W, et al. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics. 2007;120:677–682

 The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government.

PII: S0887-2171(09)00083-3

doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2009.09.003

Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 14-28 , February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution